Well, Since You Asked...

 
Well, Since You Asked...
 

 
My commentary on sports, entertainment, the news and whatever else pops into my shiny bald head.
 
 
   
 
Monday, August 31, 2009
 
The Playoff Under our Noses

With another glorious college football season about to start once again, writers, pundits and prognosticators are already throwing out picks for how the BCS games will shape up. And with every discussion of the BCS, there are the inevitable discussions of potential controversies ("What if Penn State is undefeated and there are one-loss Big 12 and SEC teams?!?"). And with every mention of controversy, there are inevitable debates on whether we should scrap the BCS and go to a playoff. This of course is the Holy Grail of 90% of college football fans, while the other 10% view it as an assault on the hallowed sanctity of the bowl system. After all, how could we go on without our precious Rose Parade each New Year's Day?

But what's surprised me over the past three years is that I never hear anyone mention one semi-obvious fact: we already have a playoff, separate from the bowls. Since 2006 when the BCS added the plus-one, we've had a two-team playoff called the BCS title game. Last year, Florida and Oklahoma played in this playoff to decide the national title, while eight other teams played in the existing four BCS bowls. So what would be the harm in adding two more teams to the BCS system (which has already moved from 8 to 10 teams), leaving eight teams to play in the bowls, but adding two more to the playoff? The BCS title game would then be preceded by two semifinal games featuring the four highest-ranked teams. Under my plan, this season's BCS schedule would then look like this:
  • Dec. 30: BCS Semifinal #1 (Atlanta) & #2 (Dallas)
  • Dec. 31: Sugar Bowl (New Orleans) & Orange Bowl (Miami)
  • Jan. 1: Rose Bowl (Pasadena) & Fiesta Bowl (Glendale)
  • Jan. 6: BCS Title game (Pasadena)
The BCS title game sites could continue to rotate among the four current cities, but the semifinal game sites open up a whole new opportunity. These games could rotate among warm-weather cities around the country, much like the Super Bowl. San Diego, Houston, San Antonio, Tampa are all potential options, as college football fans are more than willing to travel for their teams. Waves of new revenue, an inclusive four-team playoff, the preservation of the major bowls, and a tightening up of the bloated bowl schedule: what's not to love?
Comments: Post a Comment

 

 
   
  This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.  

Rate Me on BlogHop.com!
the best pretty good okay pretty bad the worst help?


Home  |  Archives